Creative HuddleAre We On The Same Page?
Log in
Four tools, one question

Are We On The Same Page?

It’s the most important question a leader can ask, and the hardest to answer honestly from the top.

These four tools answer it, at four levels. Each is free to start and takes minutes.

See the tools →
Three colleagues and a dog walking in step along a single arrow, all heading the same way.
The art of alignment

When teams and organisations are aligned, everything works better.

Decisions are easier, meetings are more productive, delivery is faster and people are more engaged. Customers notice the difference.

You hold a clear picture of where the team is going and why. Alignment is how much of that picture your team holds too, and whether they can act on it without being told twice. When they can, decisions speed up, trust deepens, and the work stops drifting away from the plan.

The same thing scales. What keeps you and your team on the same page is what keeps a whole organisation on it too: every leader, department and the culture beneath, all pulling one way so the customer meets the brand just as it was meant to be.

These four tools make it visible, at four levels: how you lead, how effectively your team works, how your people are performing, and ultimately, whether your whole organisation is on the same page.

Leadership 360

Do you lead the way you think you do?

Every leader carries a picture of how they come across. The people around them carry their own. This tool puts the two side by side. You rate how you lead, then your team, peers and line manager rate how they experience it. The results line up next to each other, so you can see exactly where your view and theirs agree, and where they drift apart.

Where the views of you and those around you match, you get strengths you can count on. Where they part company, you find blind spots. It takes minutes, asks only for survey answers, and hands you a practical report to act on.

Explore Leadership 360
YouAround you
Team Assessment

Is your team high performing?

Research shows that high-performing teams rate highly across six evidence-based dimensions. This assessment invites you and everyone on your team to rate its performance on each one.

Score highly across all six, and you have a team that largely runs itself. Low scores reveal where the team is struggling, and you'll see your view compared to everyone else's too. This gives you a rounded measure of the team, and clear next steps.

Explore Team Assessment
The leaderThe team
Nine-Box Team Grid

Are your people in the right places?

Assess everyone on your team by how they are performing now and how far they could go. You'll receive a simple grid that sorts them into nine types, from Stars to Underperformers. It takes a few minutes, and works from your own honest view of each person.

See at a glance who to stretch, who to hold on to before they leave, and who needs a rethink. With a clear map of the talent you have, you'll be able to identify a next step for every person on it.

Explore Nine-Box Grid
Rough Diamond
Future Star
Tom
Star
Priya
Inconsistent Player
Joel
Core Player
MarcusNoahAda
High Performer
LenaRavi
Underperformer
Solid Contributor
Ben
Trusted Professional
Sofia
Potential ↑Performance →
Alignment Check

Is everyone on the same page?

It's easy to assume your team sees things the way you do. Alignment is how much they really share your sense of where you are all going and why. When alignment is strong, decisions come quicker, people trust each other, and effort turns into progress.

When it drifts, the same effort produces less. Work gets duplicated or dropped, decisions get reopened, and everything feels harder than it should, often with no one able to say why. This assessment shows you how aligned everyone is today, where they diverge, and where to start, so effort translates into results.

Explore Alignment Check
Your scoresTypical
Teams we've worked with
GoogleBBCITVSEGAHarperCollinsBupaHarrodsMarks & Spencer
Achieving more alignment has created a space where open, honest dialogue could flourish, and because of that, we're now operating with greater unity, purpose, and collaboration. If you're looking to unlock the full potential of your leadership team, I can't recommend this highly enough.
Steve WilliamsonCEO, Global Inkjet Systems
The case for alignment

The work falls apart in the gaps.

In a typical organisation, 97% of leaders say the strategy is clear. But just 28% of the people delivering it can name the priorities. And the top team itself agrees on what they are in only 27% of cases. That gap is like dark matter. The people responsible for it cannot see it, and it is doing more damage than they realise.

Decades of study into strategy and teams point the same way. Alignment is one of the strongest predictors of how an organisation performs, and its absence is one of the most common reasons good strategies stall.

The payoff shows up in the numbers. In Gallup’s study of more than 112,000 teams, the most engaged teams came out 23% more profitable and 18% more productive than the least, with far lower staff turnover and absenteeism.

And the cause sits inside the team. Google’s research into team effectiveness found that how a team works together matters more than who is in it, with psychological safety, how safe people feel to speak up, mattering most. Hackman and Wageman’s work on senior teams found that the way a team is set up predicts around 60% of how effective it becomes.

Every tool here puts numbers on that same ground, for your team and your organisation, so you can see where you stand and know your first move.

Sources
  1. Strategy clarity, and how few can name or agree on the priorities (97%, 28%, 27%): D. Sull, S. Turconi, C. Sull and J. Yoder, “Turning Strategy into Results,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 2017.
  2. Engaged teams and business outcomes (23% more profitable, 18% more productive): Gallup, “The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes,” Q12 Meta-Analysis, 2024.
  3. What makes teams effective, and the role of psychological safety: Google, Project Aristotle, “The five keys to a successful Google team,” re:Work, 2015.
  4. How a team’s set-up shapes its effectiveness (around 60%): R. Wageman, D. Nunes, J. Burruss and J. R. Hackman, “Senior Leadership Teams,” Harvard Business Review Press, 2008, drawing on the Team Diagnostic Survey (Wageman, Hackman and Lehman, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2005).